Jea Moon Lee vs Evan Zhu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 28 May at 06:36 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Moon Lee vs E. Zhu

KOR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Lee 1 - 0 Zhu
They have played 3 sets in total, with Jea Moon Lee winning 2 and Evan Zhu winning 1. The last match between Jea Moon Lee and Evan Zhu was at the M15 Daegu, 28-05-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Jea Moon Lee getting the victory 6-3 3-6 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lee | 1 |
| Zhu | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Daegu(05-28-25)
J. M. Lee vs E. Zhu H2H Profile
J. M. Lee vs E. Zhu Match Preview:
- Lee has recently shown a marginally lower success rate on second serves compared to Zhu, with Lee at 44.29% and Zhu at 44.38%.
- In return games, Lee slightly trails Zhu in both second serve returns (Lee at 47.14% vs. Zhu at 47.38%) and first serve returns (Lee at 28.44% vs. Zhu at 30.87%).
- Lee has a notable edge under pressure, saving 54.39% of breakpoints, a significant lead over Zhu's 43.81%.
- Over the past year, Lee has had a higher match win percentage at 72.73%, compared to Zhu's 54.24%.
- Lee excels on indoor hard courts with a 71% win rate, whereas Zhu is strongest on clay with 59%. Both players have struggled on grass.
- Lee has been more successful in lower-level tournaments, securing a 75% win rate, while Zhu has achieved a 56.82% win rate in similar events.
- Lee has faced higher-ranked opponents on average, with an opponent ranking of 349.7 compared to Zhu's 428.46.
- In matches that require a deciding set, Zhu outpaces Lee, winning 65% compared to Lee’s 56% over the past year.
- Both players exhibit similar efficiency in converting breakpoints, with Lee at 31.67% and Zhu at 31.58%.
Editorial Prediction (May 28, 2025, UTC):
When evaluating second serve competencies, Zhu holds a slight advantage due to his marginally better performance. However, Lee has demonstrated superior resilience in crucial moments, saving breakpoints more effectively, which could be crucial under tense match conditions.
Lee's superior win rate over the last year and proficiency on indoor hard courts suggest he might be better equipped for specific contexts, though Zhu's clay court prowess could pivot the outcome if surface conditions are similar.
The quality of opponents faced also tilts the balance towards Lee, given his encounters with higher-ranked players, suggesting better preparedness for challenging matches.
While Zhu has a better record in deciding sets, the overall strengths and competitive experience of Lee hint at him being the likely winner of the upcoming match.
Jea Moon Lee vs Evan Zhu Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. M. Lee vs E. Zhu H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 14 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 2:45:20 | Average Match Time | 2:45:20 |
| 63% (62/99) | 1st Serve % | 55% (56/102) |
| 63% (39/62) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (38/56) |
| 54% (20/37) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (20/46) |
| 38% (5/13) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (4/8) |
| 43% (44/102) | Return Points Win % | 40% (40/99) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. M. Lee Recent Matches Played
E. Zhu Recent Matches Played

J. M. Lee vs E. Zhu Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66.46% (212/107) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.42% (242/238) |
| 64.07% (453/254) | Sets Win/Loss | 48.89% (549/574) |
| 56.16% (3585/2799) | Games Win/Loss | 49.94% (5285/5297) |
| 66.79% (187/93) | Hard Win/Loss | 49.53% (157/160) |
| 69.57% (16/7) | Clay Win/Loss | 58.54% (72/51) |
| 60.00% (9/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 35.14% (13/24) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.25 |
| 509 | Aces Total | 1268 |
| 0.08 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 256 | Total Double Faults | 1179 |
| 1:2:4 | Average Match Time | 1:24:5 |
| 416.43 | Average Opponent Rank | 481.52 |
| 66% (8063/12159) | 1st Serve % | 62% (17538/28447) |
| 67% (5435/8063) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (11535/17538) |
| 51% (2089/4096) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (5350/10909) |
| 43% (634/1474) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1136/2735) |
| 43% (5516/12906) | Return Points Win % | 40% (11135/28110) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 14.29% (1/6) |
| 28.00% (7/18) | Challenger W/L | 41.56% (64/90) |
| 70.21% (205/87) | Futures W/L | 55.49% (177/142) |
| 67% (209/311) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (234/472) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 58% (38/66) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (71/135) |
| 59% (44/74) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (96/168) |
| 93% (207/192) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (228/192) |
| 7% (207/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (228/36) |
| 18% (112/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (252/48) |